Most of your titles are a mixture of illustrations and text. To what extent does that combination cater to children’s needs?
The children who read our magazines are in the early stage of learning to read, so we don’t want to overwhelm them with huge chunks of text. Instead we want to introduce them to reading with a mixture of words and pictures and make them curious about reading. That approach, incidentally, is very popular with teachers, who hold comics in high regard.
Has that always been the case?
By no means. When the first “Micky Maus” [“Mickey Mouse”] magazines came out in the '50s, schools called for them to be boycotted because comics were regarded as trash. However, the situation has completely reversed now. Recently, we geared some “Micky Maus” editions specifically to the classroom. As our surveys show, many parents also welcome printed comics as a way of counterbalancing digital media a little.
Your magazines are published as stitched and perfect-bound products. What is the ratio between saddle stitching and softcover?
Two-thirds of our products are stitched and a third are perfect-bound.
How important do you consider it to be present on other channels besides your core print business as a form of emotional anchor?
It’s important, but it’s importance shouldn’t be overstated. It also varies depending on the digital channel. In the past two decades, we’ve had plenty of experience of digital media and can conclude that the forecast potential for print brands has not materialized by far. Around five years ago, there was a phase when our company group focused heavily on the production of apps. We invested a great deal of money in that, but a lot of it went down the drain. Looking back, I think we were right to take that approach to demonstrate our willingness to innovate. However, you also have to discontinue certain business models if they don’t prove to be as successful as hoped.
Is that also true of your websites?
Our experiences vary. We’ve had considerable success with the product websites for “Lustiges Taschenbuch” and the “Micky Maus-Magazin”. Marketing of ads and links to our Ehapa shop generate sufficient revenue for both the websites to support themselves with modest profits. They’re an important marketing tool, but not a business model that is comparable with print. We’ve also had some considerable successes with e-books, but nowhere near the industry forecasts of several years ago.
What proportion of children’s magazines do e-books account for?
Just under two percent in the case of “Lustiges Taschenbuch”.
Such a low percentage?
That’s largely because people in Germany tend to have reservations about digital reading materials, especially when it comes to children. In addition, digital media in Germany still have the stigma attached to them of being free of charge. People have got used to not paying for digital content. Another reason is that you need the haptic aspect of the physical book to get the full product experience. “Lustiges Taschenbuch” is a case in point. With digital media, there’s a certain distance between the reader and the content.
Do you expect the percentage of e-books to increase from two percent in the children’s magazine segment in the foreseeable future?
To tell the truth, I hardly dare to make any forecasts any more. The percentage will probably increase somewhat in the long term, but is unlikely to match the expectations of several years ago.
Can you give us a typical example of electronic media boosting the circulation of your print products?
No, we haven’t implemented any digital extension solutions that have verifiably led to an increase in sales of the printed magazine.
On the topic of electronic media, do you enhance your print products with animations, for example supplement the “Micky Maus-Magazin” with short clips as augmented reality elements?
To be honest, we haven’t yet found the optimal solution. We’re working on it, and we’ll have relevant solutions in the foreseeable future. So far the digital extension of our print products has tended to be through our websites. We’ve also experimented with QR codes, but they aren’t particularly popular with children.
Are you still pursuing electronic channels?
It varies greatly depending on the type of digital media. With “Lustiges Taschenbuch”, we’re continuing our e-books, because they’re relatively cheap to produce and we see it as a service to our readers. Naturally we’ll continue to run our websites because purchases generated in our online store via our websites result in sales revenues in the fairly low six figures. For the time-being, we aren’t working on apps, which is fine.
Under the slogan “Guided by our customers”, you seek to remain in constant dialogue with your core target group, as mentioned earlier, and regularly listen to children’s comments. How do you achieve that?
We invite school classes to our company, let them see behind the scenes and hold a short workshop with them, during which we put a pile of magazines on the table for them. That gives us a feel for how children respond, and we build their feedback into the implementation of our print products. We also conduct institutional market research, because it would be risky to draw conclusions that impact the development of our products based only on such snapshots.
Ultimately though parents are the ones who subscribe to your magazines or buy them at the newsstand. Do you know what makes parents choose your print products?
The tradition of a product often plays an important part. Many of our products are still very similar in terms of both design and content to what they were like 50 years ago, aside from the fact that all the pages are in color today. That’s why parents are often guided by their childhood memories. We benefit from the fact that many parents feel great affection for our strong brands.
A new study in the UK shows that just eight percent of parents of children aged eight and below are unconcerned about their children reading e-books, while 80 percent have concerns. There are also figures from the USA showing that parents are increasingly reading printed books instead of e-books. Do you think that reflects a retro trend for print? If so, what do you think is the explanation for that?
I don’t want to give the impression that digital media are inferior. However, one of the benefits of our print products is the fact that they counteract the fast pace of today’s world. That’s why print remains a relevant and important market for us. When it comes to the competition among different media, it shouldn’t be forgotten, however, that there isn’t only competition between print and digital. Owing to increasing leisure activities in recent years, the time available to children has decreased. Today many children are chauffeured around from one activity to the next. Nevertheless, there are increasing numbers of children’s magazines.